Rdxfbgrtj

Subsidiarity is a principle of social organization that holds that social and political issues should be dealt with at the most immediate (or local) level that is consistent with their resolution.

Subsidiarity is perhaps presently best known as a general principle of European Union law.

Definition

The Oxford English Dictionary defines subsidiarity as "the principle that a central authority should have a subsidiary function, performing only those tasks which cannot be performed at a more local level".^[1] The concept is applicable in the fields of government, political science, neuropsychology, cybernetics, management and in military command (mission command). Subsidiarity is a general principle of European Union law. In the United States of America, the principle of States' Rights is enshrined in the constitution. Although the principle is older, its expression in the term "subsidiarity" was first coined in 1891 by the Roman Catholic Church for its social teaching.

The OED adds that the term "subsidiarity" in English follows the early German usage of "Subsidiarität". ^[2] More distantly, it is derived from the Latin verb subsidio (to aid or help), and the related noun subsidium (aid or assistance). The concept as discussed here was first described formally in Catholic social teaching.^[3] Coupled with another Christian democratic principle, sphere sovereignty, subsidiarity is said to have led to the creation of corporatist welfare states throughout the world.^[4]

Political theory

Alexis de Tocqueville's classic study, Democracy in America, may be viewed as an examination of the operation of the principle of subsidiarity in early 19th century America. De Tocqueville noted that the French Revolution began with "a push towards decentralization ... in the end, an extension of centralization".^[5] He wrote that "Decentralization has, not only an administrative value, but also a civic dimension, since it increases the opportunities for citizens to take interest in public affairs; it makes them get accustomed to using freedom. And from the accumulation of these local, active, persnickety freedoms, is born the most efficient counterweight against the claims of the central government, even if it were supported by an impersonal, collective will."^[6]

Part of a series on
Christian democracy
Organizations List of Christian democratic parties Centrist Democrat International Christian Democrat Organization of America European People's Party European Christian Political Movement Konrad Adenauer Foundation Conservative Christian Fellowship Centre for European Studies
Ideas Catholic social teaching Christian corporatism Christian ethics Communitarianism Cultural mandate Dignity of labor Distributism Just war theory Neo-Calvinism Neo-Scholasticism Popolarismo Progressive conservatism Social conservatism Social market economy Solidarity Sphere sovereignty Stewardship Subsidiarity
Documents Rerum novarum Kuyper's Stone Lectures on Calvinism Graves de communi re Quadragesimo anno Laborem exercens Sollicitudo rei socialis Centesimus annus Laudato si'
People Konrad Adenauer Giulio Andreotti Alcide De Gasperi Eduardo Frei Montalva Keith Joseph Wilhelm Emmanuel von Ketteler Helmut Kohl Abraham Kuyper Pope Leo XIII Jacques Maritain Pope Pius XI Robert Schuman Luigi Sturzo
Christian democracy portal .mw-parser-output .nobold{font-weight:normal} Politics portal
v t e

As Christian Democratic political parties were formed, they adopted the Catholic social teaching of subsidiarity, as well as the neo-Calvinist theological teaching of sphere sovereignty, with both Protestants and Roman Catholics agreeing "that the principles of sphere sovereignty and subsidiarity boiled down to the same thing".^[7]

The term "subsidiarity" is also used to refer to a tenet of some forms of conservative or libertarian thought in the United States. For example, conservative author Reid Buckley writes:

Will the American people never learn that, as a principle, to expect swift response and efficiency from government is fatuous? Will we never heed the principle of subsidiarity (in which our fathers were bred), namely that no public agency should do what a private agency can do better, and that no higher-level public agency should attempt to do what a lower-level agency can do better – that to the degree the principle of subsidiarity is violated, first local government, the state government, and then federal government wax in inefficiency? Moreover, the more powers that are invested in government, and the more powers that are wielded by government, the less well does government discharge its primary responsibilities, which are (1) defence of the commonwealth, (2) protection of the rights of citizens, and (3) support of just order.^[8]

The United Nations Development Programme's 1999 report on decentralisation noted that subsidiarity was an important principle. It quoted one definition:

Decentralization, or decentralising governance, refers to the restructuring or reorganisation of authority so that there is a system of co-responsibility between institutions of governance at the central, regional and local levels according to the principle of subsidiarity, thus increasing the overall quality and effectiveness of the system of governance, while increasing the authority and capacities of sub-national levels.^[9]

According to Richard Macrory, the positive effects of a political/economic system governed by the principle of subsidiarity include:^[10]

• Systemic failures of the type seen in the crash of 2007/08 can largely be avoided, since diverse solutions to common problems avoid common mode failure.


• Individual and group initiative is given maximum scope to solve problems.


• The systemic problem of moral hazard is largely avoided. In particular, the vexing problem of atrophied local initiative/responsibility is avoided.

He writes that the negative effects of a political/economic system governed by the principle of subsidiarity include:

• When a genuine principle of liberty is recognised by a higher political entity but not all subsidiary entities, implementation of that principle can be delayed at the more local level.


• When a genuinely efficacious economic principle is recognised by a higher political entity, but not all subsidiary entities, implementation of that principle can be delayed at the more local level.


• In areas where the local use of common resources has a broad regional, or even global, impact (such as in the generation of pollutants), higher levels of authority may have a natural mandate to supersede local authority.^[10]
  

General principle of European Union law

European Union
This article is part of a series on the politics and government of the European Union
Member States Austria Belgium Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Poland Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden United Kingdom Gibraltar Presidency of the Council of the European Union Austria (July - December 2018) Special member state territories EU 3 Withdrawal from the European Union UK invocation of Article 50 Brexit
Treaties The Treaties Treaty of Paris (1951) Treaty of Rome (1957) Euratom Treaty (1957) Merger Treaty (1965) Single European Act (1986) Maastricht Treaty (1992) Amsterdam Treaty (1997) Treaty of Nice (2001) Treaty of Lisbon (2007) Article 7 Article 50 Opt-outs Treaties of Accession 1972, 1979, 1985, 1994, 2003, 2005, 2011 Other Treaties Schengen Agreement (1985) EEA Agreement (1992) Abandoned treaties and agreements European Constitution (2004) UK renegotiation of EU membership (2015-16)
Executive European Council President Tusk (EPP) Parties List of meetings European Commission Juncker Commission President Juncker (EPP) Vice Presidents College Civil Service Secretary-General Selmayr
Legislature European Parliament (Members) President Tajani (EPP) Largest groups EPP (Manfred Weber) S&D (Gianni Pittella) Member of the European Parliament 8th session (2014–19) Bureau Vice Presidents Quaestor Conference Legislative procedure Council of the EU (Presidency) Configurations General Foreign Justice and Home Economic Euro Legislative procedure Voting Secretariat Secretary-General Uwe Corsepius Directorates-general COREPER
Judiciary European Court of Justice Members Rulings General Court
Euro Eurozone Members Austria Belgium Cyprus Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Portugal Slovakia Slovenia Spain Eurogroup President Mário Centeno European Central Bank President Draghi ESCB EMU
Schengen Area Participating Schengen Area States Austria Belgium Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland (non-EU state) Italy Latvia Liechtenstein (non-EU state) Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Norway (non-EU state) Poland Portugal Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland (non-EU state) Prüm Convention Schengen Information System Visa Information System Visa policy of the Schengen Area
European Economic Area EEA Members Austria Belgium Bulgaria Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland (non-EU state) Ireland Italy Latvia Liechtenstein (non-EU state) Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Norway (non-EU state) Poland Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden United Kingdom Gibraltar EEA Joint Committee EEA National Identity cards Microstates and the European Union
Court of Auditors Budget OLAF
Other Bodies European Atomic Energy Community Agencies Investment Bank CoR EESC Ombudsman National parliaments Former European Bodies European Communities (1958-1993) European Coal and Steel Community European Economic Community
Law Acquis Primacy Subsidiarity Regulation Directive Decision Fundamental Rights
Policies and Issues Budget Customs Union Four Freedoms Area of FS&J Policies Agricultural Energy Fisheries Regional Citizenship Passports of the European Union Identity Pro-Europeanism Euroscepticism Integration Supranationalism Federalism United States of Europe Enhanced co-op
Elections 1979, 1984, 1989 1994, 1999, 2004, 2009 2014 (last election) Political parties Constituencies Referendums
Other Unofficial EU Currencies Bulgarian lev Croatian kuna Czech koruna Danish krone Hungarian forint Polish złoty Romanian leu Swedish krona Pound sterling ERM II Enlargement of the Eurozone Bulgaria and the euro Croatia and the euro Czech Republic and the euro Denmark and the euro Hungary and the euro Poland and the euro Sweden and the euro Romania and the euro United Kingdom and the euro Black Wednesday Non-Schengen Area States Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Ireland Romania United Kingdom Gibraltar Common Travel Area (UK & Ireland) Multi-speed Europe Candidate Countries for EU Membership Albania Bosnia and Herzegovina Macedonia Montenegro Serbia Turkey
Foreign Relations High Representative Federica Mogherini Foreign relations of EU Member States Austria Belgium Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Poland Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden United Kingdom Ext. Action Service Foreign Policy Defence Policy European Union Association Agreement Norway–European Union relations Switzerland–European Union relations United States-European Union relations European Union and the United Nations G7 G20
European Union portal Other countries Atlas
v t e

Wikisource has original text related to this article: Protocol on the Application of Principles of Subsidiarity and Proportionality

Subsidiarity is perhaps presently best known as a general principle of European Union law. According to this principle, the EU may only act (i.e. make laws) where action of individual countries is insufficient. The principle was established in the 1992 Treaty of Maastricht.^[11] However, at the local level it was already a key element of the European Charter of Local Self-Government, an instrument of the Council of Europe promulgated in 1985 (see Article 4, Paragraph 3 of the Charter) (which states that the exercise of public responsibilities should be decentralised). Subsidiarity is related in essence to, but should not be confused with, the concept of a margin of appreciation.

Subsidiarity was established in EU law by the Treaty of Maastricht, which was signed on 7 February 1992 and entered into force on 1 November 1993. The present formulation is contained in Article 5(3) of the Treaty on European Union (consolidated version following the Treaty of Lisbon, which entered into force on 1 December 2009):

Under the principle of subsidiarity, in areas which do not fall within its exclusive competence, the Union shall act only if and in so far as the objectives of the proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, either at central level or at regional and local level, but can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action, be better achieved at Union level.

A more descriptive analysis of the principle can be found in Protocol 2 to the European Treaties.^[12]

Court of Justice

The Court of Justice of the European Union in Luxembourg is the authority that has to decide whether a regulation falls within the exclusive competence^[a] of the Union, as defined by the Treaty of European Union and its predecessors. As the concept of subsidiarity has a political as well as a legal dimension, the Court of Justice has a reserved attitude toward judging whether EU legislation is consistent with the concept. The Court will examine only marginally whether the principle is fulfilled. A detailed explanation of the legislation is not required; it is enough that the EU institutions explain why national legislation seems inadequate and that Union law has an added value.

An example is the judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union in a legal action taken by the Federal Republic of Germany against the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union concerning a Directive on deposit guarantee schemes (13 May 1997). Germany argued that the Directive did not explain how it was compatible with the principle of subsidiarity. The Court answered:

In the present case, the Parliament and the Council stated in the second recital in the preamble to the Directive that "consideration should be given to the situation which might arise if deposits in a credit institution that has branches in other Member States became unavailable" and that it was "indispensable to ensure a harmonised minimum level of deposit protection wherever deposits are located in the Community". This shows that, in the Community legislature's view, the aim of its action could, because of the dimensions of the intended action, be best achieved at Community level. …

Furthermore, in the fifth recital the Parliament and the Council stated that the action taken by the Member States in response to the Commission's Recommendation has not fully achieved the desired result. The Community legislature therefore found that the objective of its action could not be achieved sufficiently by the Member States.

Consequently, it is apparent that, on any view, the Parliament and the Council did explain why they considered that their action was in conformity with the principle of subsidiarity and, accordingly, that they complied with the obligation to give reasons as required under Article 190 of the Treaty. An express reference to that principle cannot be required.

On those grounds, the plea of infringement of the obligation to state reasons is unfounded in fact and must therefore be rejected. (Case C-233/94^[13])

See also

References

Notes

External links

Look up subsidiarity in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

• Treaty establishing the European Community


• The Assembly of European Regions' Subsidiarity is a word movement, demanding recognition in dictionaries worldwide


• “Subsidiaritaet” in the Lexikon der sozialoekologischen Marktwirtschaft